Skip to content
Monday, 24 August 2026 A joint initiative of Legal Desire Media and Odyogeek

Space Law Journal

Submissions

We publish practitioners, academics and students. No fee to submit, no fee to publish, and a decision inside ten working days. Full guidelines and process.

We publish practitioners, academics and students. There is no fee to submit and no fee to publish, and we tell you either way inside ten working days.

Send your pitch or your finished draft to space@legaldesire.com. Read the rest of this page first. It will materially improve your chances.

space@legaldesire.com

What we want

Six things we will always read

Case notes

A decision, consent decree, enforcement action or arbitral award involving space activity. What it held, what it changed, what it did not settle. 900 to 1,500 words.

Regulatory analysis

A rule, proposal or consultation, explained for people who have to comply with it. Include the docket number and the dates. 1,200 to 2,000 words.

Jurisdiction briefings

How space activity is authorised in a country we have not covered. Especially wanted for Africa, Latin America, Southeast Asia and the Gulf. 1,000 to 1,800 words.

Explainers

A concept, instrument or process written for someone encountering it for the first time. Hard to do well and always in demand. 1,200 to 2,000 words.

Opinion

An argued position, clearly labelled. We will publish views we disagree with if the argument is good. 800 to 1,500 words.

Practice notes

How something actually works from the inside. A licensing process, a negotiation, a filing. Written from experience, not from the rule text. 900 to 1,600 words.

The rules

Guidelines, in full

None of this is unusual. All of it is enforced.

Length
Between 900 and 2,000 words for most pieces. We will consider longer work where the subject earns it. Anything under 800 words needs to be exceptional.
Originality
The piece must be unpublished and not under consideration elsewhere. We do not republish blog posts, firm client alerts or LinkedIn articles. If a shorter version has appeared somewhere, tell us up front and we will decide together.
Sourcing
Every factual claim needs a source, and we prefer primary sources. Cite the rule, the docket number, the paragraph of the decision, the treaty article. Link to the official page rather than to a summary of it. We check.
Citation style
Use whatever style you are comfortable with, applied consistently. We convert to inline links and a short source list at the end. Do not use footnotes.
Format
Word document or Google Doc. Include a working title, a one sentence summary, your name, your role and organisation as you want them published, and a two line bio.
Structure
Subheadings every 300 to 400 words. Lead with the point rather than building to it. If the piece answers a question, put the answer near the top and the reasoning underneath.
Voice
Write like a person explaining something to a colleague. Plain sentences. Active voice. No legalese where an ordinary word will do, and no throat clearing before the argument starts.
AI generated text
We do not publish text generated by a language model and presented as your own writing. Using one to research or to tidy your own draft is your business. Submitting output as a finished piece is not, and it is usually obvious.
Conflicts
Disclose anything a reader would want to know. If you act for a party, if your firm is on the other side, if you were involved in the matter, say so and we will carry a line.
Marketing
We will not publish a piece that functions as an advertisement for a firm or product. A byline and a two line bio is the credit. That is the deal and it is a good one.
Rights
You keep copyright. You grant us a non-exclusive, perpetual, worldwide licence to publish, host and promote the piece. You are free to republish elsewhere after 30 days with a credit and a link back.
Payment
We do not currently pay for contributions and we do not charge for them. If that changes, contributors will be told first.
Images
Do not send images you do not have rights to. We source our own, mostly from public domain agency archives.
Students
Welcome, and we mean it. We do not run a separate lower standard for student writing. The same guidelines apply and the same editing effort goes in.

Process

What happens after you send it

You email us

Send a pitch of a few paragraphs or a finished draft to space@legaldesire.com. A pitch is fine and often better, because we can steer the angle before you have written 1,800 words.

We acknowledge within two working days

If you have not heard anything after three, resend. Email goes astray and we would rather read it twice than not at all.

Decision within ten working days

Accept, accept subject to changes, or decline. If we decline we will tell you why in a sentence or two. It is usually scope or sourcing rather than quality.

Editing

We edit for structure, clarity and length, and we check sources. You see the edited version before it goes live. We will not change your argument or sharpen your position without asking.

Publication

Usually within two weeks of sign off, sooner if the piece is time sensitive. We add the image, the metadata and the internal links, and we send you the URL.

After

We promote it on LinkedIn. You are welcome to republish after 30 days with a credit and a link. If a rule changes and your piece needs updating, we will come back to you first.

Honest answers

The things people ask before pitching

Do you charge a publication fee?

No. We do not charge to submit, to review or to publish, and we never will for editorial content. If you are asked for money by anyone claiming to represent Space Law Journal, it is not us.

Do you accept student submissions?

Yes, and a good proportion of what we publish will come from students and early career lawyers. The guidelines are the same. Sourcing is where student pieces most often fall short, so put the effort there.

Can I republish my piece on my firm's website?

Yes, after 30 days, with a credit to Space Law Journal and a link to the original. Before 30 days, ask us and we will usually say yes if the timing matters to you.

Will you publish something critical of a regulator or a company?

Yes, if it is argued and sourced. We will fact check it harder than we would a neutral piece, and we may put the criticism to the subject for comment before publishing. That is normal practice, not a sign of hesitation.

How long until I hear back?

Acknowledgement in two working days, decision in ten. If a piece is time sensitive because of a decision or a rule change, say so in the subject line and we will move faster.

Can I write under a pseudonym?

Not normally. We publish under real names with a stated role and organisation, because attribution is part of how readers weigh an argument. In rare cases where the subject matter genuinely requires it, talk to us first.

Ready when you are

Subject line: Submission. Tell us what the piece argues in one sentence before you tell us anything else.

Email your pitch